Statement on New Rent Restriction Legislation
New legislation will be proposed this week on controlling when landlords can raise rents. This is a joint statement prepared by Smart Growth Seattle and the Rental Housing Association of Washington.
At a time when there is deep concern about housing prices in Seattle, the City Council and Mayor should use every available existing tool and new ones to address rising rents. Unfortunately, the recently proposed Tenant Protection Ordinance (the so called “Carl Haglund” law) does neither, creating a new bureaucracy, costs, and confusion for renters and landlords. And the proposal was crafted with absolutely no communication with or advice from landlords or developers.
Existing Tools Need Improvement
The existing Rental Registration and Inspections Ordinance (RRIO) Program allows for inspection of units in any building for substandard conditions and creates an avenue for tenant complaints – and holding building owners accountable for substandard conditions. However, only a third of rental properties have been registered for the program. The City should continue to refine and improve this program.
It’s worth noting that the apartments in the building that spurred this legislation actually passed an RRIO inspection before it was sold.
Creating New Problems
The new program would,
- Create a parallel reporting process for tenants along side the existing programs;
- Involve the City in legally allowed and even small rent changes all across the city;
- Disincentivize repairs and improvements, ensuring some lower rents but at the expense of making the unit or building better;
- Dramatically increase the work load of already thinly stretched City staff; and
- Expose the City to legal action for violating the State’s preemption on rent control.
Taken together, this legislation will simply add confusion for tenants and housing providers, more costs for the City, and big disincentives to take on improvements to older, more affordable rental properties. This proposal has been made with no data to support it, only anecdotes, and without the involvement of people who own and operate rental housing in the city.
Solutions
A real solution would be to provide help with financing improvements to older buildings; this would lower costs and the savings could be passed on to renters. This solution would both incentivize improvements and preserve existing affordable housing. This proposal made by Smart Growth Seattle has tentative public support from the Tenants Union. Even better, it’s an idea in the Mayor’s Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) Committee recommendations. Recommendation P4 reads, in part
As part of expanding its preservation efforts, the City should develop and market a low-cost rehab loan program to complement its existing weatherization grants. This program would provide a compelling incentive for existing owners to improve their properties in exchange for an affordability covenant. Effective outreach, marketing and technical support will be critical components to the success of the program. The City should build on the success of its weatherization program by helping owners through the contracting process and with ongoing program compliance (page 32).
The Rental Housing Association of Washington and Smart Growth Seattle would like to work with the City on solutions, but oppose this ordinance; it is unnecessary and doesn’t solve a problem but makes things worse.